WASHINGTON ― Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) acknowledged Thursday that she has a document concerning Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh that she has so far refused to share, despite behind-the-scenes requests to do so from her fellow Democrats on the Senate judiciary committee.
I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, Feinstein said in a statement. That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities.
The California Democrat, who is the senior minority member on the committee, had thus far refused to answer questions about the document, which was first reported by The Intercept.
Multiple sources have told HuffPost that the document in question is a letter sent to Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) that concerns potential sexual misconduct involving Kavanaugh and a woman when they were both in high school. Eshoos office has also declined to comment, saying the letter was considered casework ― and thus wouldnt be made public ― since it came from a constituent.
The White House took issue with Feinsteins announcement Thursday, saying that she never brought up this matter when she met with him or at his hearings.
Not until the eve of his confirmation has Sen. Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new information about him, White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said, blaming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) for an 11th hour attempt to delay Kavanaughs confirmation.
Throughout 25 years of public service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has thoroughly and repeatedly vetted Judge Kavanaugh, dating back to 1993, for some of the most highly sensitive roles, Kupec said. He has served in the Office of Independent Counsel, the White House, and on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, all before his nomination earlier this year to serve as Associate Justice on the Supreme Court.
Throughout his confirmation process, Judge Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings with senators — including with Senator Feinstein — sat through over 30 hours of testimony, addressed over 2,000 questions in a public setting and additional questions in a confidential session. Not until the eve of his confirmation has Senator Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new information about him, said White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec. She added, Senator Schumer promised to oppose Judge Kavanaughs nomination with everything I have, and it appears he is delivering with this 11th hour attempt to delay his confirmation.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who chairs the judiciary committee, said Thursday he was aware of the matter, but declined to comment because he had not seen the document in question.
All I know is what I read, and I wouldnt make any judgment of it until I get more information, Grassley told reporters outside a Senate judiciary committee hearing concerning Kavanaughs nomination.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who is considered one of the few GOP members who may vote against Kavanaugh, refused to comment on the new revelations because she hasnt seen the letter in question. Collins is also scheduled to speak with Kavanaugh on the phone Friday to follow up on other, unrelated questions.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told BuzzFeed Thursday that the matter had been referred to the FBI. An FBI official acknowledged that it has the document, saying the bureau received the information on Sept. 12 and included it as part of Judge Kavanaughs background file, as per the standard process.
That indicates theres no plan for further investigation as part of the background check process, which likely would have happened if the FBI had received the information earlier on. Kavanaughs background file is available for the White House to review.
A lawyer who is reportedly representing the woman was spotted leaving the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday evening shortly after the Intercept report was published. The lawyer, Debra Katz, has not responded to HuffPosts requests for comment.
The document is only the latest to create controversy amid the battle over Kavanaughs nomination, which is expected to receive a favorable vote in committee on Sept. 20. Republicans on Thursday voted down several attempts by Democrats to subpoena hundreds of thousands of documents that have been deemed privileged and unavailable to the public, including those related to Kavanaughs work as a key administration official for former President George W. Bush.