The state on Friday announced a “comprehensive review” of its charter school law, fulfilling one of Gov. Phil Murphys campaign promises after an era of rapid school choice growth.
Its unclear, however, how long the review will last or whether applications to expand or open charter schools will be considered during the process. Neither the state Department of Education nor the governors office answered questions about the review.
Yet the bare bones announcement appears consistent with the “time out” on charter school approvals Murphy advocated for during his campaign as well as the “pause” on charter school expansion suggested by his education transition team.
Murphy, a Democrat, has said he wants to put a hold on expanding charter schools until his administration can review the law and figure out whats working and whats not.
The New Jersey Education Association, the states largest teachers union, applauded Murphys decision. It previously called for a moratorium on charter school approvals until changes in the law were considered.
“Its past time to look closely at New Jerseys charter school law and see what needs to be changed in order to ensure that every student in every New Jersey public school has the opportunity and the resources needed to succeed,” union spokesman Steve Baker said.
New Jersey has 89 charter schools serving nearly 50,000 students, thanks in part to significant expansions approved by Christie, a Republican school choice advocate who deemed charter schools “salvation for families,” especially those in urban districts.
Operated independently of local school districts, charters are public schools that receive pass-through funding from the districts students leave, making them free for parents who cant afford private academies.
But critics say charter schools lack oversight, drain resources from traditional public schools and too often fail students with inadequate teaching. As much as Christie supported charter schools, he also ordered 20 of them to shut down because of problems in the schools academics, finances or administration.
The New Jersey Charter Schools Association said it will use the review as a chance to show Murphy why charter schools should have increased autonomy to innovate, collaborate, and focus on educating the states vulnerable and undeserved students.
At the same time the Department of Education announced the review, it also rejected five applications to expand existing charter schools: Burch Charter School of Excellence in Irvington; Classical Academy Charter School in Clifton; College Achieve Greater Asbury Park Charter School serving students in Asbury Park and Neptune; Compass Academy Charter School serving students in Millville, Vineland and Pittsgrove; and University Academy in Jersey City.
However, the department granted initial approval for an arts-based charter school to open in Salem County in 2019. That application was already partially through the approval process before Christie left office in January.
Adam Clark may be reached at email@example.com. Follow him on twitter at @realAdamClark. Find NJ.com on Facebook.
The proposed charter school in Champaign is an intriguing idea — but so far, its only an idea.
Proponents of a new charter school in Champaign for low-income K-5 students have put together a plan that offers promise while inviting skepticism.
In theory, it sounds good. After all, special charter schools in other communities have offered a credible alternative for students whose parents were dissatisfied with the education their children received in traditional public schools.
At the same time, sounding good in theory wont get the job done. Its impossible to make a judgment on the proposal made by members of the North Champaign Academy group without serious scrutiny of the details on which this proposed school will operate.
Proponents, led by former school board member Nathaniel Banks, put their plan before Champaign school board members Feb. 26, giving board members 40 days to respond.
Frankly, its hard to imagine theyre pleased to have this political hot potato dumped in their laps.
After all, the teachers union almost instantly expressed opposition to the plan for the same reason teachers unions everywhere oppose charter schools — they divert resources from an entity in which union members are heavily involved to one in which they are not.
The local NAACP is also opposing the plan “at this time,” according to their local spokeswoman.
In that context, how is the board supposed to respond to an idea that can be politically toxic?
Well, they might focus on the plans merits and conduct a fact-based determination on whether charter-school proponents can deliver what they promise.
Charter-school backers say test scores indicate that black elementary school students have unacceptably low reading scores compared with their peers.
Is that what the numbers really show? Or have they been cherry-picked to enhance the argument for a charter school? A deep dive into the test scores should reveal the answer.
The performance gap is a nationwide problem, not one peculiar to Champaign or the state of Illinois. Indeed, since 2000, the Champaign school district has spent many millions of dollars reshaping K-12 education, a consequence of the federal consent decree whose goal was to eliminate “unwarranted disparities” in performance among different groups of students.
Charter-school backers say the performance shortcomings of black students is “rooted in how we teach black children,” contending that too many white teachers in the Champaign schools “create significant cultural gaps of understanding.”
Proponents must explain — in specifics — just what changes they plan that would eliminate the cultural gap perpetuated by white teachers that has such a pernicious impact on black children.
If they say they can do it better, they should be required to explain how they intend to do it better. Maybe they can offer solutions that go far beyond the Champaign schools.
Finally, there is the cost. Backers of a charter school say their plan will cost roughly $1.4 million.
Given the profligate nature of the districts spending, that may not seem like a staggering sum at first blush. But that $1.4 million would have to come from somewhere in the school budget, a reality certain to draw criticism from those who would be adversely affected.
The bottom line is that the school board must support whatever works best and is affordable if the district is to provide low-performing students a better chance at success.
But one would have to be awfully naive to think the entire solution lies within the schools. Children need to come to school prepared to learn, and for a variety of reasons mostly related to family and poverty issues, too many do not.
That unfortunate reality puts the onus on the schools to do the best they can to make up for those shortcomings.
But how? Thats why charter-school proponents bear the burden of proof in demonstrating they really do have a better idea.
At the same time, school board members must ignore the inevitable political noise and keep an open mind until all the facts are in.
News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.