Before a packed London courtroom, Senior District Judge Emma Arbuthnot rejected the arguments made by Mr. Assanges lawyer, stating that he was not a prisoner, that his living conditions were nothing like those of a prison, and that he could have as many visitors as he liked. In fact, she said, he could — and should — walk free at any time to meet his legal fate.
Video: LIVE: Outside Ecuadorian Embassy as courts expected to give ruling on Assange arrest warrant
He is a man who wants to impose his terms on the course of justice, Judge Arbuthnot said. He wants justice only when its in his favor.
If the judge had nullified the warrant, Mr. Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, might have left the embassy, but that was far from certain. The United States and British governments have never publicly ruled out the existence of a secret request to extradite him to the United States, where he could face prosecution for publishing classified documents.
“Defendants on bail up and down the country, and requested persons facing extradition, come to court to face the consequences of their own choices,” she said. “He should have the courage to do the same. It is certainly not against the public interest to proceed.”
We are surprised, Mr. Assange said on Twitter. Judge went well outside what the parties presented in court. This seems to have led to many factual errors in the judgment.
Even if the bail arrest warrant were lifted, it is unknown whether Assange would leave the embassy and where he would go in that event. It is also unclear whether he would immediately face extradition requests if he stepped outside the embassy, which is monitored by security cameras.
On Feb. 6, Judge Arbuthnot rebuffed a claim by Mr. Assanges lawyer, Mark Summers, that the warrant was void because it stemmed from a Swedish extradition request that has since been withdrawn.
On Tuesday, she rejected the argument that the warrant was contrary to the public interest, saying that Mr. Assanges failure to surrender has impeded the court of justice.
Mr. Summers gave no immediate public response to the judges decision.
Video: UK court upholds Assange arrest warrant twice in one week
In the courtrooms public gallery, which held a large contingent of Mr. Assanges supporters, many of the judges comments met with gasps and murmurs of disapproval. Afterward, several of his allies cited a 2016 ruling by a United Nations human rights panel, stating that Mr. Assange was the victim of arbitrary detention.
I think it was appalling that the judge was disrespecting the decision of the U.N. working group, said Susan Gianstefani, 50, referring to the panel. Julian Assange is being harassed because of WikiLeaks.
The impression I have … is that [Assange] is a man who wants to impose his terms on the course of justice, whether the course of justice is in this jurisdiction or in Sweden,” she wrote in her ruling. “He appears to consider himself above the normal rules of law and wants justice only if it goes in his favor.”
Emily Butlin, 47, said the judge spoke as a representative of the U.K. government, assisting government in their work instead of representing justice.
Judge Arbuthnot dismissed the United Nations groups finding as ill informed. The British authorities have said in the past that Mr. Assange is in self-imposed isolation, not detention.
Video: Completely political: Assange loses bid to have his UK arrest warrant dropped
Judge refuses to withdraw Julian Assange arrest warrant
WikiLeaks released in 2010 a trove of government documents provided by Chelsea Manning, a United States Army analyst, which American officials said harmed national security.
Comment Email Print LONDON — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Tuesday lost his second bid in a week to overturn an arrest warrant that has prompted him to take refuge in Londons Ecuadorian Embassy for nearly six years.
In 2016, it published emails, hacked by Russian intelligence, that were damaging to Hillary Clintons presidential campaign. Mike Pompeo, the C.I.A. director, has said that WikiLeaks acts like a hostile intelligence service.
The Australian, 46, has been living in the Ecuadorean Embassy for more than five years and is wanted for failing to surrender to bail
Here are key points in his case since WikiLeaks burst onto the digital scene in 2010.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said last year that arresting Mr. Assange was a priority for the Justice Department. But no charges against him have been made public, and it is not clear whether the department has prepared an indictment but kept it under seal.
Ecuador recently granted citizenship to Mr. Assange, 46, a native of Australia, but Britain rejected an Ecuadorean request to give him diplomatic immunity so that he could leave the embassy without fear of arrest.
UK judge upholds arrest warrant for Julian Assange
Mr. Assanges legal hurdles began in 2011, when Sweden requested that he be extradited there to face accusations that he had sexually assaulted two women. He said that the charges were politically motivated, that he would not get a fair trial there, and that Sweden might turn him over to the United States.
Tuesday briefing: Julian Assange makes bid for freedom
After the British courts rejected his bid to quash the extradition request, Ecuador granted him asylum and he took refuge in the embassy. In doing so, he jumped bail, which resulted in the British arrest warrant.
Mr. Summers argued that Mr. Assanges fear that Sweden would hand him to the American authorities was reasonable justification for violating his bail conditions. Judge Arbuthnot said there was no evidence to think that would happen.
This week, news organizations reported that years ago, Swedish prosecutors considered giving up the sexual assault case, but their British counterparts urged them not to.
Last year, Swedish authorities did drop their investigation of Mr. Assange, along with the request to extradite him, and the arrest warrant is the only remaining legal issue that is publicly known.
In the latest bid to quash the warrant, Mr. Summers said that Mr. Assanges health had suffered from being unable to leave the embassy, and that he lacked exposure to sunlight. Judge Arbuthnot responded that Mr. Assanges health was adequate — she accepted that he had depression and a bad tooth — and she rejected the claim about sun deprivation, noting that he had spoken to reporters from a sunny balcony at the embassy.
Follow Richard Pérez-Peña and Iliana Magra on Twitter: @perezpena and @Magraki.
British judge refuses to withdraw arrest warrant for Julian Assange
A judge upheld a British arrest warrant for Julian Assange on Tuesday, saying the WikiLeaks founder should have the courage to come to court and face justice after more than five years inside Ecuadors London embassy.
Yes, Assange, well still nick you for skipping bail, rules court
Judge Emma Arbuthnot rejected arguments by Assanges lawyers that it no longer is in the public interest to arrest him for jumping bail in 2012 and seeking shelter in the embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden. Prosecutors there were investigating allegations of sexual assault and rape made by two women, which Assange has denied.